record-review
victorrentea/human-reviewSkill
After you implemented a change in this conversation, review it adversarially and record what you fixed, declined and assumed in a committed review-points.md, for /human-review to render. Explicit invocation only — user types /record-review [base].
Why this score
This repo hosts 4 skills, so its 29 stars are split between them (about 7 each) for scoring.
Popularity score: 59/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank
Security
Scanned Oct 20, 2026 at commit 7bf88c9055a9, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.
What its code does:
- Runs shell commands Common for dev tools. Read the commands it runs.record-review.py:202
A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan
Alternatives
Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.
| Name | Score | Stars | Context | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This onerecord-review victorrentea/human-review · Skill | 59 | ★ 29 | ≈65 always | 16d ago |
| record-and-replay ilysenko/codex-desktop-linux · Skill Both about record | 82 | ★ 3.9k | ≈46 always | 16d ago |
| decision-records fvadicamo/dev-agent-skills · Skill Both about record | 53 | ★ 72 | ≈133 always | 2mo ago |
| architecture-decision-records tranhieutt/software_development_department · Skill Both about record | 49 | ★ 73 | ≈69 always | 6mo ago |