Home / Skills / review-others-manuscripts
review-others-manuscripts
gxCaesar/open-research-skillsSkill
Use when acting as an invited referee on someone else's submission, including writing a referee report, drafting reviewer comments, assessing a revision round against the authors' response letter, running an editorial prescreen for scope and policy, or judging whether a stated claim is carried by the evidence in a manuscript under review. Use for a manuscript that is not yours and is confidential; rehearsing objections against your own unsubmitted paper is a different task.
Why this score
This repo hosts 10 skills, so its 56 stars are split between them (about 6 each) for scoring.
Popularity score: 51/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank
Security
Scanned Oct 20, 2026 at commit c79bac60f882, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.
None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.
A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan
Alternatives
Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.
| Name | Score | Stars | Context | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This onereview-others-manuscripts gxCaesar/open-research-skills · Skill | 51 | ★ 56 | ≈126 always | 1mo ago |
| consistency-checker-across-manuscript aipoch/medical-research-skills · Skill Both about manuscript | 63 | ★ 2.0k | ≈53 always | 2mo ago |