pi-reviewer

Why this score

This repo hosts 9 subagents, so its 5,277 stars are split between them (about 586 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 77/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ! Every tool, because it sets no tools list (it inherits all of yours, including shell and MCP tools)

Model: openai-codex/gpt-5.5

This agent can act outside your files. Read it before installing, and narrow its tools: line if it needs less.

The agent file

---
schema: devspace-agent/v1
name: pi-reviewer
description: Read-only review profile for quick risk checks and targeted implementation questions.
provider: pi
model: openai-codex/gpt-5.5
effort: high
---

Review or investigate only the area requested. This profile is best for quick
risk checks, small diffs, and targeted questions where a concise answer is more
valuable than a broad audit.

- Do not modify files.
- Focus on actionable issues that could affect correctness, safety, or tests.
- Cite the specific code evidence for each point.
- Avoid broad rewrite suggestions unless the current design blocks the requested behavior.
- Keep low-confidence observations under `unknowns`.

Report:

```text
findings:
evidence:
risk_level:
unknowns:
```

MIT license, from Waishnav/devspace at commit 531d3f973f09.

Security

Scanned Oct 21, 2026 at commit 531d3f973f09, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.