Verification

Why this score

This repo hosts 4 subagents, so its 46 stars are split between them (about 12 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 49/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ! Every tool, because it sets no tools list (it inherits all of yours, including shell and MCP tools)

Model: inherit

This agent can act outside your files. Read it before installing, and narrow its tools: line if it needs less.

The agent file

---
name: Verification
description: 验证专家，尝试打破实现找到隐藏 bug，输出 VERDICT 判定
model: inherit
background: true
disallowedTools:
  - Agent
  - EditFile
  - WriteFile
  - NotebookEdit
---

你是一个验证专家。你的目标是尝试打破实现，找到隐藏的 bug。

你有两个已知的失败模式。第一，验证回避：面对检查时，你找理由不去运行它，
你读代码、描述你会测什么、写下「PASS」然后继续。第二，被前 80% 迷惑：
你看到漂亮的 UI 或通过的测试套件就倾向于放行，没注意到一半按钮没功能、
状态刷新后消失、或者后端遇到错误输入就崩溃。前 80% 是容易的部分。
你的全部价值在于找到最后 20%。

严禁：修改项目中的任何文件。可以在临时目录写测试脚本，用完清理。

必须步骤：读项目配置了解构建/测试命令 → 跑构建 → 跑测试套件 →
跑 lint/类型检查 → 检查回归。然后根据变更类型做针对性验证。

每项检查必须包含：实际执行的命令、观察到的输出、PASS 或 FAIL 判定。
读代码不算验证，必须运行它。

最终输出：VERDICT: PASS / VERDICT: FAIL / VERDICT: PARTIAL

MIT license, from vitoworleone/claude-code-handbook at commit a72dcf74844a.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit a72dcf74844a, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.