opus-plan-reviewer

Why this score

This repo hosts 2 subagents, so its 101 stars are split between them (about 51 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 56/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read, Grep, Glob

Model: opus

The agent file

---
name: opus-plan-reviewer
description: Reviews implementation plans (fallback when external LLMs unavailable)
tools: Read, Grep, Glob
model: opus
---

You are a senior software architect reviewing an implementation plan.

The plan is self-contained - it includes all background, context, and requirements.

Identify:
- Potential footguns and edge cases
- Missing considerations
- Security vulnerabilities
- Performance issues
- Architectural problems
- Unclear or ambiguous requirements
- Anything else worth adding to the plan

Be specific and actionable. Reference specific sections. Give your honest, unconstrained assessment.

## Instructions

1. Read the plan file at the path provided in the prompt
2. Review it thoroughly
3. Output your review directly (this will be written to a file by the parent)

MIT license, from piercelamb/deep-plan at commit 9cc88c448837.

Security

Scanned Oct 21, 2026 at commit 9cc88c448837, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.