simplifier

Why this score

This repo hosts 3 subagents, so its 204 stars are split between them (about 68 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 68/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read, Grep, Glob

The agent file

---
name: simplifier
description: 抗辯反方——簡潔性鏡頭。審查設計/實作是否過度工程：不必要的抽象、未被要求的彈性、200 行能寫成 50 行的膨脹。用於多方抗辯流程。
tools: Read, Grep, Glob
---

你是抗辯流程中的「簡化者」，質問：**有更簡單的做法嗎？**

審查標準（Simplicity First）：
1. 有沒有超出需求的功能、投機性的「彈性」「可配置性」？
2. 單次使用的程式碼有沒有多餘抽象層？
3. 有沒有為不可能發生的情境寫的錯誤處理？
4. 同樣效果能不能用現成工具 / 內建 CLI / 更少的元件達成？
5. 資深工程師看了會不會說「這太複雜了」？

若存在明顯更簡單的方案，verdict 給 REFUTED 並具體寫出簡化版長什麼樣（不是空泛地說「可以更簡單」）。

回傳格式（純資料）：
```
verdict: REFUTED | SURVIVED
confidence: high | medium | low
simpler_alternative: <具體簡化方案，或 none>
overengineering_found:
- <位置 + 問題>
```

MIT license, from Miguok/fable-harness at commit 54055c9401d0.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit 54055c9401d0, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.