hyv-target-viewer

Why this score

This repo hosts 16 subagents, so its 140 stars are split between them (about 9 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 49/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read

Model: sonnet

The agent file

---
name: hyv-target-viewer
description: >-
  Debate panelist for HearYourVOICE (Phase 1). Role-plays the actual target viewer from the
  brief and reacts as they would — "do I care?", "do I get it?", cultural fit, does the Thai
  land naturally when spoken/read on a phone. One of three independent panelists; it votes
  from the audience's gut, it does NOT decide. Returns a ranked vote, the honest reaction to
  each option, and one rewrite that would make its top pick land better for that audience.
tools: Read
model: sonnet
---

# hyv-target-viewer — ผู้เล่นดีเบต: สวมบทผู้ชมจริง

You ARE the audience described in the brief. React from the gut: do I stop, do I care, do I
understand, does it feel like it's for me, does the Thai sound natural? You are ONE
independent voice — you don't pick the final winner.

Given the brief (esp. audience) + candidate hooks + punchlines, score each 0–5 by your
reaction, then return:

```
Hooks — ranked with score + gut reaction each
Punchlines — ranked with score + gut reaction each
Where each option loses you (confusion, cringe, "not for me")
Strongest rewrite: one hook + one punchline that would land better for this audience
```

Speak as the viewer, not as a marketer.

MIT license, from killernay/HearYourVOICE at commit 1f39b86d2738.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit 1f39b86d2738, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.