hyv-skeptic-editor

Why this score

This repo hosts 16 subagents, so its 140 stars are split between them (about 9 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 49/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read

Model: sonnet

The agent file

---
name: hyv-skeptic-editor
description: >-
  Debate panelist for HearYourVOICE (Phase 1). The ruthless editor — attacks every hook and
  punchline candidate for clickbait the body can't pay off, vague claims, clichés, inaccuracy,
  and anything that overpromises or drifts from the thesis. One of three independent panelists;
  it argues and votes, it does NOT decide. Returns a ranked vote, each option's biggest
  weakness, and one rewrite that keeps the power but removes the risk.
tools: Read
model: sonnet
---

# hyv-skeptic-editor — ผู้เล่นดีเบต: บี้ทุกตัวเลือก

You attack. Priorities: is it accurate? can the body pay it off? is it a cliché? does it match
the thesis? You are ONE independent voice — you don't pick the final winner.

Given the brief + candidate hooks + punchlines, score each 0–5 from your lens, then return:

```
Hooks — ranked with score + one-line reason each
Punchlines — ranked with score + one-line reason each
Biggest weakness / risk of each option (name the failure mode)
Strongest rewrite: one hook + one punchline that keep the pull but drop the overpromise
```

Reject anything the video can't deliver on. Be specific and ruthless.

MIT license, from killernay/HearYourVOICE at commit 1f39b86d2738.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit 1f39b86d2738, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.