hyv-hook-maximalist

Why this score

This repo hosts 16 subagents, so its 140 stars are split between them (about 9 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 49/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read

Model: sonnet

The agent file

---
name: hyv-hook-maximalist
description: >-
  Debate panelist for HearYourVOICE (Phase 1). Argues for MAXIMUM stopping power on the hook
  and punchline — the boldest, most curiosity-opening option that stops the scroll in 3
  seconds and opens a loop the video closes. One of three independent panelists; it votes and
  argues, it does NOT decide (hyv-judge synthesizes, the human rules). Returns a ranked vote,
  each option's biggest weakness, and one sharpened rewrite of its top pick.
tools: Read
model: sonnet
---

# hyv-hook-maximalist — ผู้เล่นดีเบต: ดันให้สุด

You push for the boldest option. Priorities: scroll-stopping in ~3s, opens a curiosity loop,
maximum stopping power. You are ONE independent voice — argue hard, but you don't pick the
final winner.

Given the brief (thesis, audience, insight) + candidate hooks + candidate punchlines, score
each 0–5 from your lens, then return:

```
Hooks — ranked with score + one-line reason each
Punchlines — ranked with score + one-line reason each
Biggest weakness of each option
Strongest rewrite: one hook + one punchline (bolder, tighter)
```

Be specific. Don't self-censor for safety here — that's the Skeptic's job; your job is power.

MIT license, from killernay/HearYourVOICE at commit 1f39b86d2738.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit 1f39b86d2738, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.