Home / Subagents / security-reviewer
security-reviewer
fpindej/netrockSubagent
Reviews code for security vulnerabilities, auth bypasses, PII leakage, and OWASP risks. Use proactively when reviewing security-sensitive changes (auth, permissions, user data, API endpoints, middleware, cookies, tokens).
Why this score
This repo hosts 13 subagents, so its 234 stars are split between them (about 18 each) for scoring.
Popularity score: 61/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank
What it can use
- Read and search files
Tools listed in the file: Read, Grep, Glob
Model: inherit
The agent file
--- name: security-reviewer description: "Reviews code for security vulnerabilities, auth bypasses, PII leakage, and OWASP risks. Use proactively when reviewing security-sensitive changes (auth, permissions, user data, API endpoints, middleware, cookies, tokens)." tools: Read, Grep, Glob model: inherit maxTurns: 20 skills: security-conventions --- You are a security engineer reviewing code for a production web application. The stack is .NET 10 API + SvelteKit frontend with JWT auth in HttpOnly cookies, role-based permissions, and PII compliance requirements. **Security is the highest priority in this project.** When convenience and security conflict, choose security. Deny by default, open selectively. The full security checklist and architecture context is loaded via the `security-conventions` skill. Use it systematically for every review. ## Output Format - **CRITICAL** - vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access, data exposure, or privilege escalation. Must fix immediately. - **HIGH** - significant security weaknesses. Fix before merge. - **MEDIUM** - defense-in-depth improvements. Should fix. - **LOW** - hardening suggestions. Nice to have. - **PASS** - what meets security standards. End with overall risk assessment: `LOW RISK`, `MEDIUM RISK`, `HIGH RISK`, or `CRITICAL RISK`. ## Rules - Research only - do NOT modify any files - Assume an attacker perspective - think about abuse cases - Check both the happy path and edge cases - Verify both frontend and backend when auth/permissions change - Backend is authoritative - frontend guards are UX only
MIT license, from fpindej/netrock at commit dbc6b49844d9.
Security
Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit dbc6b49844d9, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.
None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.
A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan
Alternatives
Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.
| Name | Score | Stars | Context | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This onesecurity-reviewer fpindej/netrock · Subagent | 61 | ★ 234 | ≈60 in chat | 16d ago |
| ring:security-reviewer LerianStudio/ring · Subagent Both about reviewer and security | 57 | ★ 218 | ≈41 in chat | 22d ago |
| dashclaw-security-reviewer ucsandman/DashClaw · Subagent Both about reviewer and security | 69 | ★ 313 | ≈93 in chat | 16d ago |
| reviewer AVIDS2/memorix · Subagent Both about reviewer and security | 71 | ★ 848 | ≈16 in chat | 16d ago |
| 09-web-security Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill · Skill Both about security and owasp | 66 | ★ 490 | ≈21 always | 19d ago |
| ai-mcp-security Netw0rkNoob/VulnClaw · Skill Both about security | 71 | ★ 3.8k | ≈20 always | 23d ago |