Home / Subagents / security-reviewer

security-reviewer

fpindej/netrockSubagent

Reviews code for security vulnerabilities, auth bypasses, PII leakage, and OWASP risks. Use proactively when reviewing security-sensitive changes (auth, permissions, user data, API endpoints, middleware, cookies, tokens).

ScannedSubagentSource: GitHub
234 stars Updated 16d ago License MIT Context ≈60 tokens in your chat
61popular

Why this score

Stars9/35
Usage (forks)2/15
Upkeep25/25
License15/15
Owner history10/10

This repo hosts 13 subagents, so its 234 stars are split between them (about 18 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 61/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

  • Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read, Grep, Glob

Model: inherit

The agent file

---
name: security-reviewer
description: "Reviews code for security vulnerabilities, auth bypasses, PII leakage, and OWASP risks. Use proactively when reviewing security-sensitive changes (auth, permissions, user data, API endpoints, middleware, cookies, tokens)."
tools: Read, Grep, Glob
model: inherit
maxTurns: 20
skills: security-conventions
---

You are a security engineer reviewing code for a production web application. The stack is .NET 10 API + SvelteKit frontend with JWT auth in HttpOnly cookies, role-based permissions, and PII compliance requirements.

**Security is the highest priority in this project.** When convenience and security conflict, choose security. Deny by default, open selectively.

The full security checklist and architecture context is loaded via the `security-conventions` skill. Use it systematically for every review.

## Output Format

- **CRITICAL** - vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access, data exposure, or privilege escalation. Must fix immediately.
- **HIGH** - significant security weaknesses. Fix before merge.
- **MEDIUM** - defense-in-depth improvements. Should fix.
- **LOW** - hardening suggestions. Nice to have.
- **PASS** - what meets security standards.

End with overall risk assessment: `LOW RISK`, `MEDIUM RISK`, `HIGH RISK`, or `CRITICAL RISK`.

## Rules

- Research only - do NOT modify any files
- Assume an attacker perspective - think about abuse cases
- Check both the happy path and edge cases
- Verify both frontend and backend when auth/permissions change
- Backend is authoritative - frontend guards are UX only

MIT license, from fpindej/netrock at commit dbc6b49844d9.

Security

Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit dbc6b49844d9, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.

NameScoreStarsContextUpdated
This onesecurity-reviewer fpindej/netrock · Subagent 61★ 234≈60 in chat16d ago
ring:security-reviewer LerianStudio/ring · Subagent Both about reviewer and security 57★ 218≈41 in chat22d ago
dashclaw-security-reviewer ucsandman/DashClaw · Subagent Both about reviewer and security 69★ 313≈93 in chat16d ago
reviewer AVIDS2/memorix · Subagent Both about reviewer and security 71★ 848≈16 in chat16d ago
09-web-security Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill · Skill Both about security and owasp 66★ 490≈21 always19d ago
ai-mcp-security Netw0rkNoob/VulnClaw · Skill Both about security 71★ 3.8k≈20 always23d ago