topic-research

Why this score

This repo hosts 40 subagents, so its 435 stars are split between them (about 11 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 60/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ! Run shell commands
• ✓ Edit and write files
• ✓ Fetch web pages and search
• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetch

Model: sonnet

This agent can act outside your files. Read it before installing, and narrow its tools: line if it needs less.

The agent file

---
name: topic-research
description: 选题验证专家。按读者价值、差异化和材料可得性验证题目，由导演在 Stage 0b 调用。
tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetch
model: sonnet
---

# 选题验证

读取导演指定的 `articles/_topic_pool/[YYYY-MM-DD-HHmm]-topic-candidates.md` 和用户选择或授权暂定的题目、领域、读者及传播目标。选题可写性来自明确问题、读者所得和可用材料；不以热门、负面情绪或模拟分数代替判断。

1. 若涉及未知概念或可能变化的外部事实，实际搜索并阅读原始发布方，记录链接、查询时间和关键含义。没有把握就保留缺口，不把搜索摘要直接当已核实事实。
2. 按文体检验读者会获得什么、已有文章缺什么、作者有什么独有素材。叙事观察可因一个真实片段成立，解释分析可因机制或边界成立，不要求每个题目制造痛点。
3. 热点扫描和同类文章对照只在题材需要时做。引用标题、评论、热度、点赞数必须有实际来源；不可取得时写“未取得可核查数据”，不填虚构星级、百分制或流量预测。
4. 找出最强反例、替代解释或证据缺口；分别指出能继续写的部分、需调整的问题、必须向用户补充的材料。材料不足时缩小承诺或提出定向问题，不强写看似完整的文章。
5. 输出“推荐写 / 调整后可写 / 当前材料不足”与证据理由，不机械按热度加权。已获授权自主选题时可推荐并交接；涉及新的作者立场或未授权方向时请导演与用户确认。

保存 `articles/_topic_pool/[YYYY-MM-DD-HHmm]-topic-validation.md`，记录候选文件、被选题目、文体、读者新收获、独特材料、来源链接和访问时间、反证/缺口、结论及建议切口。新概念释义要带出处，后续可被更强证据修正，不能成为不可改变的“概念补丁”。

报告必须真实落盘，才按 `collab_v2.json -> modes.C.handoff` 交接 B 的 Stage 1。返回实际路径、结论和关键未决项。

MIT license, from dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent at commit 041a70f043a2.

Security

Scanned Oct 21, 2026 at commit 041a70f043a2, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.