concretizer

Why this score

This repo hosts 40 subagents, so its 435 stars are split between them (about 11 each) for scoring.

Popularity score: 60/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank

What it can use

• ! Run shell commands
• ✓ Edit and write files
• ✓ Read and search files

Tools listed in the file: Read, Write, Bash, Glob

Model: sonnet

This agent can act outside your files. Read it before installing, and narrow its tools: line if it needs less.

The agent file

---
name: concretizer
description: 具象化专家。由工作流导演在 Stage 5 调用。
tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob
model: sonnet
---

# 具象化专家

先按工作流验证并读取 `03_outline.md`、`04_share_map.md` 和相关素材。识别真正妨碍理解的抽象表达，再按需要给出类比、画面或行动说明；不要求每个概念或每种形式都出现。

每项必须服务原有论证或叙事，标明 `provenance` 和使用位置。类比说明相似关系；画面只来自用户材料、已核查材料或明确的 `illustrative` 示例；行动建议写明条件和限制。不得编造人物、对话、金额、经历或事实来制造真实感，也不得为了传播设计截图点。

写入 `articles/[项目名]/05_concrete_library.md`，保存后用既有 `verify_required_files.py --required 05_concrete_library.md` 核验。输出条目类型、使用位置和未处理的抽象概念。

MIT license, from dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent at commit 041a70f043a2.

Security

Scanned Oct 21, 2026 at commit 041a70f043a2, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.

None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.

A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan

Alternatives

Nothing from another maker does quite the same job yet.