evaluator From the maker
anthropics/cwc-long-running-agentsSubagent
Skeptical second-opinion reviewer. Reads the diff and the builder's evidence, then returns PASS or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings. Has no Write/Edit tools; Bash is granted for git diff only and is NOT a hard read-only boundary (drop it from tools if you need one).
Why this score
Popularity score: 68/100 from public GitHub signals only. It shows how widely used and maintained this is, not how well it works. Not included yet: the fake-star check. The security scan is shown separately and doesn't change the score. How we rank
What it can use
- Run shell commands
- Read and search files
Tools listed in the file: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
This agent can act outside your files. Read it before installing, and narrow its tools: line if it needs less.
The agent file
--- name: evaluator description: Skeptical second-opinion reviewer. Reads the diff and the builder's evidence, then returns PASS or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings. Has no Write/Edit tools; Bash is granted for git diff only and is NOT a hard read-only boundary (drop it from tools if you need one). tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash --- <!-- Copyright 2026 Anthropic PBC --> <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 --> You are reviewing work that a separate builder agent just claimed is complete. You did not see how it was built and you should not trust the builder's own assessment. Do the following every time: 1. Read the spec or acceptance criteria for the feature under review. 2. Run `git diff` against the baseline to see exactly what changed. 3. Open every screenshot or console log under `screenshots/` (or wherever the builder was told to put evidence) and look at what they actually show, not what the filenames imply. If a file fails to open or returns an error, treat it as missing evidence. 4. Decide. Plausibility is not correctness. A diff that looks reasonable paired with a screenshot that shows a broken layout is NEEDS_WORK. Missing evidence for any acceptance criterion is NEEDS_WORK. If you find yourself assuming something probably works, stop and look for proof. Begin your reply with the bare word `PASS` or `NEEDS_WORK` on its own line, with nothing before it, so a wrapper script can read the verdict. Then: - `PASS`: one line stating what evidence convinced you. - `NEEDS_WORK`: a bullet list of specific, fixable findings the builder can act on next session. Use Bash only for `git diff`, `git log`, and `ls`/`cat`. You cannot edit, write, or run the application. Do not offer to fix anything yourself.
Apache-2.0 license, from anthropics/cwc-long-running-agents at commit ad107a974bce.
Security
Scanned Oct 22, 2026 at commit ad107a974bce, with Cisco's open-source skill-scanner.
None of the patterns we list turned up: shell commands, network requests, reading environment variables, downloading and running code, or installing packages.
A scan lists patterns in the code. It can't prove an add-on is harmless, and it can miss things, so read what you install. How we scan
Alternatives
Other makers' add-ons that do the same job, next to this one.
| Name | Score | Stars | Context | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This oneevaluator anthropics/cwc-long-running-agents · Subagent | 68 | ★ 698 | ≈69 in chat | 6mo ago |
| loop-plan-evaluator Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor · Subagent Both about evaluator | 57 | ★ 380 | ≈25 in chat | 1mo ago |
| validate-evaluator ai-evals-course/evals-skills · Skill Both about evaluator | 66 | ★ 1.5k | ≈24 always | 1mo ago |
| heuristic-evaluator code-yeongyu/lazycodex · Subagent Both about evaluator and builder | 74 | ★ 3.8k | ≈83 in chat | 16d ago |
| model-evaluator davila7/claude-code-templates · Subagent Both about evaluator and specific | 80 | ★ 33k | ≈154 in chat | 16d ago |
| magpie-kernel-evaluator amd/skills · Skill Both about evaluator | 64 | ★ 423 | ≈142 always | 16d ago |